Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs InternVL2-40B

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

InternVL2-40B Shanghai AI Lab

36.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 52.7 to 33.7.
  • InternVL2-40B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
ProviderOpenAIShanghai AI Lab
Noometry Index65.636.6
Released2026-09-292024-07-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked341

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—
LMArena Coding1487—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1466—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1464—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—
LMArena Expert1502—

Multimodal GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), InternVL2-40B: 33.7

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
LMArena Vision1288—
Video-MME—61.2%
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1477—
LMArena Russian1455—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
LMArena Instruction Following1468—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
LMArena Longer Query1465—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), InternVL2-40B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2-40B
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1432—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than InternVL2-40B?

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and InternVL2-40B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and InternVL2-40B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper