Model comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Olmo 7b Instruct
GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 30.2.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 65.6 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1016 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1755 | — |
| SciCode | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 60% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |
Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1466 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 95.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 54.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 80% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.09 | — |
Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1464 | 1018 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 100% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1502 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |
Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1455 | 947 |
Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1468 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1432 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.