Model comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#303); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 28.3.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 2 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1040 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1028 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1038 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1058 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#303); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.