Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#310); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 27.4.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
GPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.128.8
Released2026-09-292024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
DeepSWE75.2%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
LMArena Coding—1102

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1100
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Math—17.6%
LMArena Math—1151

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1134
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1087

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1088

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text—1110
LMArena Creative Writing—1083
LMArena Multi-Turn—1068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#310); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper