Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Pixtral 12B

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); Pixtral 12B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Pixtral 12B Mistral AI

31.3

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 1 category and Pixtral 12B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 52.7 to 23.9.
  • Pixtral 12B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Pixtral 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index65.631.3
Released2026-09-292024-09-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.15
Results tracked342

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—
LMArena Coding1487—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1466—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1464—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—
LMArena Expert1502—

Multimodal GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Pixtral 12B: 23.9 (#127)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
LMArena Vision12881009
GeoBench—37%
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1477—
LMArena Russian1455—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
LMArena Instruction Following1468—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
LMArena Longer Query1465—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Pixtral 12B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 12B
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1432—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Pixtral 12B?

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); Pixtral 12B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Pixtral 12B?

Pixtral 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Pixtral 12B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral 12B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper