Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) Alibaba (Qwen)

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.1—
Released2026-09-292024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked26

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
DeepSWE75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index—112.93
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper