Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Summary

  • Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3 Coder Plus specifications
GPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index65.6—
Released2026-09-292025-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1
Output $ / M tokens$10$5
Results tracked341

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—
LMArena Coding1487—
ALE-Bench—456.5

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1466—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1464—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—
LMArena Expert1502—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1477—
LMArena Russian1455—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1468—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1465—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1432—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper