Model comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2-Flash
GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 114× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Astra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Astra scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Astra leads 85.1 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 31.7% for GPT-6 Astra and 0% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for GPT-6 Astra.
- GPT-6 Astra accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 70.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-03 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 56 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1786 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 56.5% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | 2,951 | 737.95 |
| DeepSWE | 74.1% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 65.5% | — |
| GSO | 79.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 93.6% | — |
| MirrorCode | 46.7% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.7% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 20.8% | — |
| BALROG | 68.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 34.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 15,515 | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.7% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 95% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 98.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 72% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 76.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 84% | — |
| DTBench | 97.3% | — |
| LMCA | 64.4% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.45 | — |
Math GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 97.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1483 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 54.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 75.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1281 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 49.7% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1468 | — |
Multilingual GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1430 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1484 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1379 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1426 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | 1420 |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1450 | 1392 |
Long Context GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1456 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1418 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1448 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2173 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Astra better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 114× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Astra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra lists at $10 and $50.
Is GPT-6 Astra or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
GPT-6 Astra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 73.7 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Astra does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Astra and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Astra has 56 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.