Model comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Astra leads 93.5 to 23.1.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 70.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-03 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | — |
| Results tracked | 56 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 74.1% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1786 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 65.5% | — |
| SciCode | 56.5% | — |
| GSO | 79.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 93.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | — |
| MirrorCode | 46.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,951 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.7% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 20.8% | — |
| BALROG | 68.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 34.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 15,515 | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 95% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 98.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 72% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 76.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 84% | — |
| DTBench | 97.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 64.4% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.45 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 97.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 54.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 75.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1483 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1281 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 49.7% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1468 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1430 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1484 | — |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1450 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1456 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Astra leads
GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Astra | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1418 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2173 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1448 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Astra better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6 Astra or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
GPT-6 Astra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 73.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Astra and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Astra has 56 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.