Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Olmo 3 32b Think

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

70.8

Rank #1 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.7

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Astra scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Astra leads 85.1 to 25.9.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index70.838.7
Released2026-09-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$50—
Results tracked5614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14871319
DeepSWE74.1%—
FrontierCode53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1786—
FrontierSWE65.5%—
SciCode56.5%—
GSO79.4%—
WeirdML93.6%—
MirrorCode46.7%—
ALE-Bench2,951—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
APEX-Agents64.7%—
Remote Labor Index20.8%—
BALROG68.3%—
GDP.pdf34.2%—
Vending-Bench 215,515—

Reasoning GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14621302
ARC-AGI-295%—
NYT Connections (extended)98.1%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles72%—
EBR-Bench76.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles84%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA64.4%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.45—

Math GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14651316
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 497.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14831273
GPQA Diamond95.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam54.8%—
SimpleQA Verified75.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1281—
Blueprint-Bench 249.7%—
Furniture Assembly80%—
LMArena Document1468—

Multilingual GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14301255
LMArena Chinese14841300
LMArena French14561291
LMArena German14401290
LMArena Russian14361254
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1426—
LMArena Spanish1407—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14501275

Long Context GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14561296

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14411300
LMArena Creative Writing14181256
LMArena Multi-Turn14481290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2173—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Astra better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Astra or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 73.7 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Astra and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Astra has 56 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper