Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

45.1

Rank #65 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 40.1.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark specifications
GPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index45.150.3
Released2026-09-222026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked1827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24), Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Coding14481482
DeepSWE66.6%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1583—
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68), Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts14151475
NYT Connections (extended)68.7%—
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.09

Math Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140), Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Math13961455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Expert14581458
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Too close to call

GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27), Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
Furniture Assembly44.2%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111), Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English13901464
LMArena Chinese14251507
LMArena Russian13921467
LMArena Spanish14161471
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1457

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85), Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14141443

Long Context Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14171451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115), Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark
LMArena Text13921474
LMArena Creative Writing13571460
LMArena Multi-Turn14001477

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Luna or Muse Spark better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 45.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 18 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper