Model comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs Olmo 7b Instruct
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-6 Luna leads 58.4 to 26.0.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 45.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1448 | 1016 |
| DeepSWE | 66.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1583 | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 993 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.7% | — |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1458 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 44.2% | — |
Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1390 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | 946 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1417 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1392 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1357 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1400 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6 Luna or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.