Model comparison
GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.1
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.1 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Sol leads 59.6 to 33.4.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 49.2 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1692 | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1445 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49), Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1436 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |
Math Too close to call
GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1422 |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1417 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9), Grok 4.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113), Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1464 |
| LMArena Russian | 1407 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | 1438 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97), Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1400 |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15), Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Sol better than Grok 4.1?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6 Sol or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Grok 4.1 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.