Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Laguna XS.2

GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#12); Laguna XS.2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Laguna XS.2 Poolside

32.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 2 categories and Laguna XS.2 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 21.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 83% for GPT-6 Sol and 0% for Laguna XS.2.
  • Laguna XS.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
ProviderOpenAIPoolside
Noometry Index61.832.9
Released2026-09-222026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked452

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Laguna XS.2: 34.4

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
LMArena WebDev16881302
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
SciCode57.6%—
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1418—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Laguna XS.2: 21.1

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
ProofBench83%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
LMArena Math1402—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
LMArena Non-English1385—
LMArena Chinese1405—
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Russian1401—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
LMArena Instruction Following1412—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
LMArena Longer Query1411—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolLaguna XS.2
LMArena Text1395—
LMArena Creative Writing1378—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—
LMArena Multi-Turn1412—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Laguna XS.2?

GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#12); Laguna XS.2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Laguna XS.2 better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Laguna XS.2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Laguna XS.2 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper