Model comparison
GPT-6 Sol vs Nemotron 3 Super
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 74.0 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 90.1% for GPT-6 Sol and 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 57.6% | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | 2,462 | 213.9 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1688 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 26.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 14,428 | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | 15.4% |
| CritPt | 30.9% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1418 | 1386 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 56% | — |
| DTBench | 97.3% | — |
| LMCA | 59.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.72 | — |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1402 | 1380 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 89.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 83% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 36.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |
Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | 1355 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | 1410 | 1405 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1401 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1384 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1341 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1412 | 1347 |
Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1411 | 1362 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1395 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1378 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1369 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Sol better than Nemotron 3 Super?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.
Is GPT-6 Sol or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Nemotron 3 Super share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.