Model comparison
GPT-6 Sol vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 25.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 49.2 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1346 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1692 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 28% | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1322 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1305 |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1307 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |
Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1407 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1298 |
Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Sol better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6 Sol or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.