Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3-1.7B

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-6 Sol and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
GPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index61.826.6
Released2026-09-222025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked454

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
APEX-Agents54.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
EBR-Bench53.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1418—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%8.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
ProofBench83%—
LMArena Math1402—

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond94.3%38%
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1385—
LMArena Chinese1405—
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Russian1401—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1412—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1411—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1395—
LMArena Creative Writing1378—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—
LMArena Multi-Turn1412—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3-1.7B?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3-1.7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper