Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5 Plus

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

49.2

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 32.0.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
  • GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
GPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.242.3
Released2026-09-222026-02-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.40
Results tracked2215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1692—
LMArena Coding1453—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
GDP.pdf28%—
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
Chess Puzzles—22%
EBR-Bench53.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1420—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.79

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1404—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%10.7%
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
LMArena Expert1449—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1416—
LMArena Russian1407—
LMArena Spanish1377—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1415—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1396—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—
LMArena Multi-Turn1405—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper