Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Wizardlm 13b

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 30.2.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Wizardlm 13b specifications
GPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index61.831.4
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked4510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14471035
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14181018
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14021017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13851034
LMArena Chinese14051023
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Russian1401—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14121048

Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14111054

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13951077
LMArena Creative Writing13781091
LMArena Multi-Turn14121047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Wizardlm 13b?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper