Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#12); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft

31.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 2 categories and WizardLM-2 8x22B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 28.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.3% for GPT-6 Sol and 43.4% for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper at $0.62 / $0.62 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
  • GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index61.831.4
Released2026-09-222024-04-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M66K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.62
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.62
Results tracked452

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1418—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 28.9

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—
LMArena Math1402—
MATH Level 5—25.7%

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 23.3

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
GPQA Diamond94.3%43.4%
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Non-English1385—
LMArena Chinese1405—
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Russian1401—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following1412—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query1411—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Text1395—
LMArena Creative Writing1378—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—
LMArena Multi-Turn1412—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?

GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#12); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.62 per million input tokens and $0.62 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and WizardLM-2 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and WizardLM-2 8x22B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper