Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 29.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.229.1
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%29.6%
LMArena Coding10901040
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731028

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math11171089

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1064984

Multilingual Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10331000
LMArena Chinese10701016
LMArena Russian10451004
LMArena French—1038
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10561023

Long Context Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1071996

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text10801050
LMArena Creative Writing10461024
LMArena Multi-Turn1053989

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (27.8 vs 28.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper