Model comparison
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Pixtral Large
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Pixtral Large leads 32.9 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | — |
Reasoning Pixtral Large leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | — |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | — |
Writing & Preference Pixtral Large leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.