Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 56.2 to 52.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 35.4% for Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.129.1
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%29.6%
LMArena Coding11131040
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%40.6%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10921028

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math11431089

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1087984

Multilingual Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10371000
LMArena Chinese10631016
LMArena Russian10601004
LMArena French—1038
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10881023

Long Context Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1122996

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text10961050
LMArena Creative Writing10711024
LMArena Multi-Turn1063989

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 28.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper