Model comparison
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.6 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.6 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 35.4% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1092 | 1018 |
Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1143 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1087 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1037 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1063 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1060 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1088 | 1048 |
Long Context Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1122 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1096 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1071 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1063 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.6 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.7 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.