Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Grok 3

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 3 leads 52.3 to 30.9.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Grok 3 specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index32.439.9
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1340

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Coding11861432
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts11451434
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.33

Math Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Math11521391
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Expert11421421
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Non-English10991410
LMArena Chinese11451448
LMArena Russian10921416
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Instruction Following11311409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Longer Query11621439
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Text11501426
LMArena Creative Writing11291414
LMArena Multi-Turn11081425
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Grok 3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper