Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #57 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.8 to 35.7.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Inkling-Small specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
ProviderIBMThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index31.846.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Coding11861451
LMArena WebDev—1408
SciCode—48.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Inkling-Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts11461424
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.13

Math Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Math11521453
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Expert11421442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —, Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English10991400
LMArena Chinese11451458
LMArena Russian10921392
LMArena French—1438
LMArena German—1412
LMArena Japanese—1399
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Spanish—1426

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following11311397

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query11621401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Text11501413
LMArena Creative Writing11291330
LMArena Multi-Turn11081420
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Inkling-Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper