Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 35.5.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Solar Pro4 specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
ProviderIBMUpstage
Noometry Index32.442.1
Released—2026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—524K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Coding11861437
LMArena WebDev—1371

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Solar Pro4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts11451399

Math Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Math11521416

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert11421427

Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English10991361
LMArena Chinese11451415
LMArena Russian10921360
LMArena French—1397
LMArena German—1364
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Spanish—1401

Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following11311377

Long Context Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query11621381

Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructSolar Pro4
LMArena Text11501386
LMArena Creative Writing11291316
LMArena Multi-Turn11081385

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Solar Pro4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper