Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 74× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 100% for Qwen3.8 Max.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Qwen3.8 Max.
- Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 56.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | 2026-08-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 118K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1502 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 40% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1496 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |
Math Qwen3.8 Max leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 100% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1499 |
Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1507 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1538 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1492 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1479 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1489 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1479 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1489 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 74× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Qwen3.8 Max?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen3.8 Max share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.