Model comparison
Granite 4.1 30B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 30B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B and 60.9% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 34.0 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-29 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 2 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Granite 4.1 30B: 35.2, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.8% | 60.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Granite 4.1 30B: 22.4, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.1 30B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 30B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Granite 4.1 30B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 30B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 30B has 2 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.