Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 36.4.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Kimi K3 specifications
Granite 4.1 8bKimi K3
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.459.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1353

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena WebDev11921654
LMArena Coding13121508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts12931496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Math13121491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Expert13091521
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Non-English12611466
LMArena Chinese13371529
LMArena Russian12401482
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following12691483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query12751494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bKimi K3
LMArena Text12901476
LMArena Creative Writing12511454
LMArena Multi-Turn12681488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Kimi K3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper