Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.4

Rank #126 Confirmed

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.4

Rank #233 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 26.7 to 16.4.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
Granite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index41.433.4
Released—2024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Coding13941288
WeirdML—22.2%
LiveBench Coding—46.4%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Hard Prompts13751272
SimpleBench—22.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
DTBench—65.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.48
LiveBench—54.3%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—11.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Expert14051254
GPQA Diamond—53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English13401282
LMArena Chinese14151289
LMArena Russian13421286
LMArena French—1317
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Instruction Following13461270
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query13591276

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text13631305
LMArena Creative Writing12941284
LMArena Multi-Turn13401290
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper