Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.4

Rank #126 Confirmed

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 41.4.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4 specifications
Granite 4.2 30bGrok 4
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index41.447.8
Released—2025-07-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1148

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), Grok 4: 49.9 (#44)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Coding13941408
Aider Polyglot—79.6%
WeirdML—45.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4: 32.1 (#62)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), Grok 4: 36.9 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Hard Prompts13751409
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.6%
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.46
ForecastBench—60.9

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4: 46.5 (#58)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84%
Omni-MATH—60.3%
LMArena Math—1422
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), Grok 4: 53.7 (#50)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Expert14051417
GPQA Diamond—87%
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4: 33.1 (#89)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Vision—1211
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), Grok 4: 52.0 (#98)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Non-English13401403
LMArena Chinese14151428
LMArena Russian13421409
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1429
LMArena Japanese—1396
LMArena Korean—1376
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), Grok 4: 79.4 (#4)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Instruction Following13461387
IFEval—94.9%

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Longer Query13591409
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), Grok 4: 58.7 (#111)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4
LMArena Text13631412
LMArena Creative Writing12941397
LMArena Multi-Turn13401416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
WildBench—79.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper