Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Llama 3-70B

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 20.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 3-70B specifications
Granite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index41.828.8
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1131

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding13961206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.93
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
LMArena Math—1218
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Expert14061149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English13401142
LMArena Chinese14141114
LMArena Russian13431159
LMArena French—1232
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following13471194

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query13591174

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text13611221
LMArena Creative Writing12881210
LMArena Multi-Turn13391223

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Llama 3-70B?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 3-70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper