Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 54.3.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 44.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1394 | 1516 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1481 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1516 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1342 | 1424 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1346 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1465 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1363 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.