Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 54.0 to 27.8.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index41.854.8
Released—2026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Coding13961514
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741503
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert14061516

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English13401481
LMArena Chinese14141529
LMArena Russian13431490
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following13471477

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query13591488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text13611490
LMArena Creative Writing12881455
LMArena Multi-Turn13391482
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper