Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 26.0.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4.6 specifications
Granite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index39.456.9
Released—2026-08-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1149

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Coding13611465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts13061447
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.44

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
LMArena Math—1423

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Expert13151467
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English12681420
LMArena Chinese12691480
LMArena Russian12491422
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1376
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following12731431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query12911454

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.6
LMArena Text12931428
LMArena Creative Writing12051428
LMArena Multi-Turn12901425

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4.6 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper