Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Grok 4 Fast

Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 39.2.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Granite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index39.439.4
Released—2025-09-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1130

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Coding13611429
LMArena WebDev—1159
WeirdML—42.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts13061412
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
DTBench—82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.2
ForecastBench—60.5

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Math—1419

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Expert13151411
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English12681396
LMArena Chinese12691457
LMArena Russian12491389
LMArena French—1431
LMArena German—1383
LMArena Japanese—1352
LMArena Korean—1357
LMArena Spanish—1415

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following12731387

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Longer Query12911415
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text12931407
LMArena Creative Writing12051387
LMArena Multi-Turn12901414

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Grok 4 Fast?

Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4 Fast share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper