Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Mixtral 8x7B

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

26.8

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 35.6 to 11.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
Granite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index39.026.8
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—32K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked1138

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding13631127
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13081115
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.38
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
Omni-MATH—10.5%
LMArena Math—1147
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Expert13131088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English12681077
LMArena Chinese12681055
LMArena Russian12491090
LMArena French—1165
LMArena German—1114
LMArena Japanese—931
LMArena Korean—968
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following12711110
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query12931103

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text12951132
LMArena Creative Writing12151109
LMArena Multi-Turn12931115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Mixtral 8x7B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper