Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs o1

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 39.2.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and o1 specifications
Granite 4.2 3bo1
ProviderIBMOpenAI
Noometry Index39.440.9
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1152

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), o1: 46.1 (#70)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Coding13611367
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), o1: 27.9 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Hard Prompts13061371
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.91
LiveBench—75.7%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, o1: 36.1 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
LMArena Math—1388
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), o1: 41.5 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Expert13151361
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), o1: 48.6 (#142)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Non-English12681358
LMArena Chinese12691394
LMArena Russian12491356
LMArena French—1344
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Korean—1396
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), o1: 74.8 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Instruction Following12731367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), o1: 50.3 (#9)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Longer Query12911378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference o1 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), o1: 55.6 (#144)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo1
LMArena Text12931366
LMArena Creative Writing12051348
LMArena Multi-Turn12901369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and o1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper