Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 47.2.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3 Max specifications
Granite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.443.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding13611456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13061448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1446
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert13151455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English12681429
LMArena Chinese12691478
LMArena Russian12491428
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12731419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query12911438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3 Max
LMArena Text12931439
LMArena Creative Writing12051402
LMArena Multi-Turn12901446

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper