Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 49.6.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Granite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index40.541.3
Released—2025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output118K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$0.28
Results tracked1121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding13801443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13291420
CritPt—0%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math—1396

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert13841425

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English13021392
LMArena Chinese13661462
LMArena Russian12851387
LMArena French—1429
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13011392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13241409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text13201411
LMArena Creative Writing12361375
LMArena Multi-Turn13011404

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper