Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 12, 2026. 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Summary

The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 26.6 to 10.6.
Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
Provider	IBM	Mistral AI
Noometry Index	40.5	31.9
Released	—	—
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	131K	131K
Max output	118K	105K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.06	$0.40
Output $ / M tokens	$0.25	$2
Results tracked	11	3

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Coding	1380	—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
NYT Connections (extended)	—	6.5%
Thematic Generalization	—	20.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts	1329	—

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Expert	1384	—

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English	1302	—
LMArena Chinese	1366	—
LMArena Russian	1285	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following	1301	—

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query	1324	—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Granite 4.2 8B	Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text	1320	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1236	—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	—	1476
LMArena Multi-Turn	1301	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.