Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 26.6.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Qwen3.8 Max.
  • Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Granite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.556.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1M
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$6
Results tracked1139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding13801502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13291496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert13841507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English13021472
LMArena Chinese13661538
LMArena Russian12851481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13011479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query13241489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text13201483
LMArena Creative Writing12361479
LMArena Multi-Turn13011489

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.8 Max?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max lists at $2 and $6.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 40.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper