Model comparison

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.7 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 41.4 to 38.1.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think specifications
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.737.9
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding12691291

Reasoning Too close to call

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts12551272

Math Too close to call

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math12651305

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert12381295

Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English12571209
LMArena Chinese12621242
LMArena French12861260
LMArena German12731262
LMArena Russian12611193
LMArena Spanish12791289
LMArena Japanese1213—
LMArena Korean1195—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following12451247

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query12661272

Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text12811272
LMArena Creative Writing12421226
LMArena Multi-Turn12651252

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.7 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper