Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 16.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 22.7% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 56% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1241 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | 56% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 65.2% | 87.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278), Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1283 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225), Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1317 | 1416 |
| LMArena German | 1287 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | 1347 |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | 1411 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1376 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1390 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1389 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.9 vs 33.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.