Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Mercury 2.5

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mercury 2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Mercury 2.5 Inception

33.5

Rank #242 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury 2.5 leads 39.5 to 33.3.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mercury 2.5 specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index33.733.5
Released2024-08-132026-09-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—260K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked344

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury 2.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
SciCode—38.5%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—
ALE-Bench—301.65

Reasoning Mercury 2.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
SimpleBench22.7%—
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Mercury 2.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
ProofBench—3%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Mercury 2.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Mercury 2.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Mercury 2.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Mercury 2.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Mercury 2.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury 2.5
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Mercury 2.5?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mercury 2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Mercury 2.5 better for coding?

Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper