Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs o1-pro
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1-pro leads 20.4 to 16.9.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $600 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | — |
Reasoning o1-pro leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | — |
| DTBench | 65.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1283 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | — |
| LMArena French | 1318 | — |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than o1-pro?
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.