Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 48.8 to 26.0.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1016 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 993 |
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| DTBench | 65.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1283 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 946 |
| LMArena French | 1317 | — |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1007 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.