Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 37.6 to 20.8.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Step 3 specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index33.740.5
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Coding12871367
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts12721355
SimpleBench22.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Math12831366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Expert12541333
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Non-English12821327
LMArena Chinese12891397
LMArena German12871371
LMArena Korean12371269
LMArena Russian12861331
LMArena Spanish12811371
LMArena French1318—
LMArena Japanese1244—

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following12701332
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Longer Query12761326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3
LMArena Text13051350
LMArena Creative Writing12841321
LMArena Multi-Turn12901341
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper