Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Wizardlm 70b

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 48.6 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index33.733.0
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding12871081
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts12721079
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math12831116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English12821078
LMArena Chinese12891052
LMArena German12871083
LMArena Russian12861155
LMArena French1318—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following12701093
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query12761097

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13051120
LMArena Creative Writing12841149
LMArena Multi-Turn12901108
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Wizardlm 70b?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper